Decision Making with a Neonatal Ethical Dilemma

finish Making with a neonatal respectable DilemmaNatalia PerdomoIntroductionEthical dilemmas have been at the forefront in the healthc atomic number 18 industry. Nurses are endlessly faced with situations in which difficult decisions must be do. It is crucial to check into at what point autonomy outweighs persevering role wellbeing.Gather DataThe respectable situation presents a woman delivering a thwart in a country hospital later suffering complications. These complications arrive at inadequate type O delivery to the ball up. The baby is supported by sustainment and hydration and currently in an unresponsive affirm to verbal and tactile stimulus. The neonatal intensive give care unit supply and have got have never experienced this situation in the past and are unaware of how to proceed. The parents are in a state of extreme sadness while the staff feels overwhelmed and uncertain in regards to a solution. Information non presented in this case includes reappraisa l of Apgar score, gestational age, weight of sister or type of delivery as well as renders medical history.Key ParticipantsThe recognise participants in this dilemma include the parents, the NICU staff and the nanny who is primarily responsible for the m early(a)s care. When considering the mothers perspective, it is crucial to understand the many factors that play into her theory process. She has been through a difficult labor and is stated to be weak and grieving. When asked to return a decision, she feels competent enough to install a valid decision. The father, who is also grieving, agrees with his wife, who is in a di proveed state. Both parents are saddened by the match of the child and feel there is no choice other than to throw overboard life support measures be sire they pry quality of life and do non want their infant to endure suffering any longer.The NICU staff, who compliment themselves in valuing patient autonomy, want to be as supportive as possible and perform in the trump interest of the patient. The carry and staff agree that the mother does non have decision-making capacity at the cadence of the decision. The prevail demonstrates an good struggle, as she needs to fulfill her supportive government agency towards her patient. She feels that by not offering enough information, she hobonot assist the parents in making the best decision or intervene due to her wishing of knowledge. instruction of Ethical Problem of ConflictThe ethical conflict rests on the nanny-goat in this case. The conflict is whether she should support the decision of her patient to discontinue nutrition and hydration or whether she should sample out alternative options to convince her patient to reassess her decision.Review of LiteratureWhen dissecting a situation such as this one, it is searing to understand the key points in their entirety to mildew the most impressive approach. According to Conde-Agudelo and Romero (2012), an amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is known as a rare and fatal obstetric condition associated with severe symptoms such as sudden cardiovascular collapse, respiratory distress, altered mental status and foetal distress. It is currently the second leading cause of maternal end in the U.S. and must sire prompt and aggressive treatment by a multidisciplinary team. The fetal distress caused by AFE results in hypoxia of the neonate, which in consequence whitethorn cause life threatening injuries and lifelong disability. Anju, Naijil, Paulose, Roshni and Shilpa (2012) state that hypoxia may cause multi organ failure and functional damage especially to the cardiovascular and commutation nervous systems. The authors also note that because hypoxia has the potential to induce neuronal death in vulnerable brain regions, impairment of cognitive function stooge be detected later in life.In addition to the cause of the AFE, it is crucial to understand the hormonal process contributing to the emotional state in the postpartum period. After a woman gives birth, the levels of estrogen and progesterone decline rapidly. Harvard Medical School (2011) exempts that due to the plummet of hormones immediately after birth, emotional instability may result as these reproductive hormones interact with neurotransmitter systems that reckon mood and mental health. Expected post partum emotions, according to turner (2012) include feelings of tiredness, anxiety, tearfulness, lack of energy and insomnia.There are many laws that dress to protect the rights of the infant and claw. The United Nations promulgation of the Rights of the Child (1959) states that the child shall be entitled to grow and develop in health to this end, special care and protection shall be declare oneselfd both to him and to his mother, including adequate pre-natal and post-natal care. Although care and protection of the infant is essential, there are always exceptions. In the court case miller v. HCA (1990), a premature infan t was born with multiple complications and a distressing vista. The parents made it clear they wanted no measures taken to save the infant. However, the physicians intervened irrespective and initiated life sustaining measures. These parents valued quality of life and disagreed with life sustaining measures due to likeliness of severe and permanent physical and mental impairments in the future. When their autonomy was not respected and the infant was kept alive, the parents became responsible for the life of a child with severe disabilities.Aladangady and Rooy (2012) clarify that babies with poor prognosis should have treatment decisions made jointly by the health care team and infants family while considering the best interests of the baby and current clinical condition. Ethics committees in hospitals serve as resources to the providers as well as the patients and should be considered as they provide morals education. However, Gaudine, Lamb, LeFort and Thorne (2011) assess barr iers to requesting an morality confab, which include consult worsening the situation, unhelpful consultations, solutions conflicting with good practice and working with unqualified ethics consultants.Supporting Principles or TheoriesBurkhardt Nathaniel (2014) define autonomy as the freedom to progress choices slightly issues that affect ones life, free from lies, restraint, or coercion (p. 60). This principle respects each individual and highlights his or her uniqueness and value within a society. There are four basic elements that congeal autonomy. The autonomous somebody must be respected, have the ability to determine explicit personal goals, have the capacity to decide on a see and have freedom to autonomously act upon choices made. Children, fetuses and individuals with mental impairments are not considered autonomous therefore, they are unable to make informed choices.The principle of liberality according to Burkhardt Nathaniel (2014) requires that moderates act in ways that will benefit their patients by doing good. There are three major components within this principle, which include doing or promoting good, preventing harm and removing evil or harm. By striving to act in ways that are morally and legally correct, it put ups the nanny-goat to gain trust from her patients as well as from society.Within the context of the situation, the two ethical principles presented oppose each other in regards to the ethical dilemma of the check. By supporting the decision to discontinue hydration and nutrition, the agree is respecting the patients autonomy. The baby does not possess autonomy and therefore, cannot make decisions. The parents possess the right to make decisions as they see fit and the foster must respect their freedom. The treasure abides by the principle of beneficence by choosing to seek out options to provide the best possible alternatives within her scope of practice. By doing this, she can inform the parents and give them an o pportunity to make an educated decision, which may facilitate re discernment of the decision to prevent any further harm to the neonate.Desired burden for All ParticipantsThe desired outcome for the situation presented is for the country hospitals NICU staff to work together and form a plan of care that is in the best interest of the neonate. The plan of care should be discussed with the parents and they should feel positive with their informed decision. Once the plan is discussed with the parents and they are in agreement, the NICU team will work together to implement the plan.OptionsThe suck may support her patients wishes to have life sustaining measures draw back in the infant. Within the mothers current emotional state, this exertion may seem as the most reasonable but raze the line, she may feel extreme guilt and regret. This decision may motivate moral distress amongst the cling to and NICU staff due to their lack of knowledge and guidance in the situation. However, b y supporting the decision the nurse demonstrates respect for patient autonomy. If the infant is disconnected, the staff may chat to the parents about providing palliative care and donation of the infants viable organs.The nurse may also choose to reassess both mother and baby for a week due to the mothers sign lack of decision-making capacity. This option violates patient autonomy as the parents wish to disconnect hydration and nutrition. By keeping the baby in its current state, it may cause difficulties for the parents as they value quality of life and disagree with life sustaining measures. However, this option provides the nurse with an opportunity to intervene, consult specialists, research and learn about the mothers condition and most effective implementation. By reassessing both patients for a week, it buys the infant some time to recuperate from birth trauma and allows the mother to light upon optimum health in order to make a shrewd decision.Another option that may be considered in this situation is to consult the hospitals ethics committee. Since the nurse is unsure of whether to support parents or encourage them to reassess their decision, she may call in a third gear party to intervene. This option also goes against the patients wishes and may cause them to lose trust in the nurse, which may result in stress on the patient-nurse relationship. The patient and her husband may also refuse to speak to the ethics committee altogether. However, if the patient and her husband consider the option of sermon to an ethicist, it allows them to discuss their decision-making process and values with an unbiased party. By incorporating another person who was not initially involved in the situation, it will assist in relieving some distress the staff feels in regards to the dilemma. termination and JustificationThe best decision in this case is for the nurse to reassess both the patient and infant for a week due to the mothers initial lack of decision-making capacity. Although this choice goes against the autonomy of the mother, it is a decision that is made in the best interest of both the mother and the infant. Extra time allows the nurse to obtain research about AFEs and clinical manifestations to better aid her patient. As stated earlier, one of the main symptoms of an AFE is altered mental status, which may explain why such a rash decision was initially made. The nurse is aware of the altered mental status and must intervene due to the principle of beneficence. During this time, the nurse may consult with a neurologist to get word the mothers neurologic status and monitor for any impairment. Furthermore, the nurse may consider consulting a neonatologist to determine possible treatment options and prognosis of the infant.This option serves as the most effective over the others because it involves the most thought out process. The option to support her patients wishes and autonomy is not in the best interest of the mother or baby, as the nurse is aware of the mothers lack of decisional making capacity. It is the nurses responsibility to do good within her scope of practice and seek out the best option for her patient this option does not allow her to do so. Requesting an ethics consult would involve more staff in this very delicate situation and most likely negatively affect the nurse-patient relationship by further upsetting the patient and her husband.Effectiveness of DecisionThe decision that is chosen by the nurse is effective because it involves the implementation of a plan that is carried out by the staff, as well as other collaborative means such as neurology and neonatology. This decision provides the nurse with an opportunity to research options with the patients best interest in mind while providing the patient with the prospect of healing. Meanwhile, the infant may receive an appropriate evaluation to determine likelihood of survival. If after further assessment possession of decisional capacity is confirmed, along with confirmation of infants same(predicate) state, the parents may then restate their wishes to disconnect nutrition and hydration as they strongly value quality of life. At this point, the nurse may feel confident in her decision to support the patients autonomy as the appropriate measures were taken.ConclusionThis scenario is one of many in which a nurse may be faced with a difficult decision. Assessment is the key component in determining whether or not autonomy outweighs patient wellbeing. Once a conclusion can be deferred, the nurse can then implement the most effective plan of care.ReferencesAladangady, N., Rooy, L. (2012). Withholding or withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for newborn infants. Early Human Development, 88, 65-69.Anju, T.R., Naijil, G., Paulose, C.S., Roshni, T. Shilpa, J. (2013). Neonatal hypoxic insult-mediated cholinergic disturbances in the brain stem effect of glucose, group O and epinephrine resuscitation. Neurological Sciences , 34(3), 287-296.Burkhardt, M.A., Nathaniel, A.K. (2014). Ethics and issues in contemporary nursing (4th ed.). Clifton Park, NY Delmar Publishers.Conde-Adudelo, A. Romero, R. (2009). amnic fluid embolism an evidence-based review. American Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, 201(5), 445e1-445e13.Declaration of the rights of the child. (2014). In United Nations Cyber School Bus.Retrieved, from https//www.un.org/cyberschoolbus/huma nright s/resources/child.aspGaudine, A., Lamb, M., LeFort, S.M. Thorne, L. (2011). Barriers and facilitators to consultinghospital clinical ethics committees. Nursing Ethics, 18(6), 767-780.Harvard Medical School. (2011). Beyond the baby blues. Harvard Mental Health Letter,28(3), 1-3. simoleons State University. Case Study Miller v. HCA. Retrieved fromhttps//www.msu.edu/course/hm/546/miller_v_hca.htmTurner, S. (2012). postnatal emotions. Midwifery Today, 12(5), 33-36.